European Tropical Forest Research Network![]() |
Discusion summary: Research, development and policy priorities
| By Peter Wood |
INTRODUCTION
The main topics for the period 14-25 April were research, development and policy priorities, very wide subjects which had been partly discussed earlier under other themes. For a start we had the excellent theme paper (Chikamai and Kigomo) which drew attention to gaps in knowledge, which research can fill, with three case studies from dryland Kenya. Ben and Bernard listed many items of importance which I will not repeat here - they are in the paper. It is a formidable list which we must now try to prioritise.
In my own paper for the theme I added that a major issue was identifying gaps in enabling policies and political initiatives. I mentioned that the outputs of research are primarily knowledge, but also technologies and sometimes materials. I indicated how we might prioritise research topics and finally listed some features of an Integrated Ecosystem Management approach which might guide us.
RESULTS
We had some good discussions, though perhaps the groups were a little weary
by this stage of the discussion! I will divide my summary into two parts, the
first on what was said over the past two weeks and the second on what was not
said, or only touched on, which still has to be addressed. These are more policy
and socioeconomic oriented, some of which were highlighted by Prof. Owino and
Frank Berninger earlier in the meeting. Because no matter how good our technologies,
they are useless if policies prevent them being applied. For active researchers
who are anxious to get on with their work there is an understandable tendency
not to look beyond the present for emphasis on research and policy.
IMMEDIATE RESEARCH TOPICS
A good deal of the
discussions were on these immediate practical problems - what I called in my
paper Problem-solving or Optimising research. Major research areas discussed
included:
STRATEGIC RESEARCH DEALING
WITH CHANGE
What is still
needed (and this we hope will form a major part of the workshop discussion)
is strategic research taking a long view. Some topics are:
Much land degradation in dry zones has been driven by economic forces - pressures of commercial farming, demands by governments for taxes, sudden appearances of markets for a single commercial product. Many of the commercial demands have been for large quantities of biomass, such as charcoal, although some have been environmentally benign, such as honey and beeswax. The point here is that technological research is only part of the answer and there is a need for much more knowledge about the economics of land use. Plantations are increasingly widespread but they demand relatively high inputs; their economics often make their products too costly to compete with materials taken from natural formations.
There is also a need for more knowledge about the processes involved in land use decision making, by farmers, by foresters, by officials. Land use planning is almost entirely Agricultural Land Use Planning; it seldom looks at forests, nor even at trees outside forests. Agroforestry as a discipline is quite recent and the management of rangelands often sees woody plants - "bush encroachment" - as part of the problem rather than as a component in maintaining land productivity. Yet most commercial rangelands were created by land clearance.
We should address Dr Bellefontaine's question "how can we restore the woody vegetation to create environmental stability" as a particularly relevant one, which needs both technology and enabling policy to address it.
We must also explore further how to facilitate effective land use negotiation platforms involving farmers and other land users (eg nomadic peoples), foresters, officials, agricultural extension agents, and others.